This is huge. (But it’s also one of those “the correction gets a fraction of the attention the error got” things.)
Via Nate Silver, the electoral implications of hypothetical solely-male and solely-female electorates in the US (2016):
Given the absence of a realistic geo-political segregation option, continuing tension can be safely anticipated. (There still has to be a way to break the place up that makes more sense, such as starting with the places that don’t change color when gender-flipped.)
The coming Shenzhen?
China shrugs at whitewash on the wall.
Abstract eroticism, synthetic seduction, and creepy families.
Is there anything π can’t do?